|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
|
Conclusion
Here
I must draw my little history to an end, though how much it leaves out no one knows better than its author.
Indeed, I feel like Sinbad, leaving the Valley of Diamonds with only a pocketful, for the past of South Africa
is thickly strewn with the ungarnered jewels of romance. Of the Basuto wars I have said nothing, of the
Kalihari and the terrible treks through the "thirst-veld" nothing, of the great missionaries and explorers
nothing, of the shipwrecks on the coast nothing. I have left untouched the wonderful story of the diamond
mines and the gold-fields. Of the wars between Boer and Boer, of Kruger and Joubert, Brand and Burgers, and
all the other figures of the republics, there is next to nothing, and I have had to pass over such great
Governors as Sir George Grey and Sir Bartle Frere with only a reference. I should like to have written of the
early days of Kimberley; when Cobb's coaches took roaring loads of diggers along the rock-hewn road over
Bain's Kloof, where one may still see the old names cut on the rock, and over the wide Karoo to where the
tents clustered round the claims. It would be interesting to go over the old story of the pretensions of the
Orange Free State to land which she never
possessed, and the attempts of the Boers to rule a mining camp which ended so happily with British annexation.
It would be interesting also to trace the growth of Johannesburg and the attempts of the Dutch there also to
hold new wine in old bottles. This would bring us to the legacy of the great surrender, to the struggles of
the Reformers who asked in vain for a share in the government of which they were the main support, and
ultimately to the Jameson Raid, to the great work of Lord Milner, and to the last Transvaal War. In leaving
such parts of the story alone, it is my excuse that while the remote past with which I have mainly dealt is
apt to be forgotten, these later chapters are fresh in the minds of most of us, and have been written, not
once, but a hundred times.
Then what thrilling romances are the lives of Cecil Rhodes and Dr. Jameson, and their work, the opening of the
Great North Road and the annexation of those huge territories which are now called Rhodesia. Both men have
been much abused and ardently defended; but the abuse can hardly come from the student of South African
history, who is also a Briton and a lover of his race, nor indeed can it come from the South African colonist
himself, Dutch or English, who realises the vast heritage conferred by these men upon generations of South
Africans yet unborn. The Great North Road is an open road now, with its long ribbon of railway reaching almost
to Tanganyika and the heart of Africa, but it was won in the face of odds so great and against foes so many
and strong—the Boers, the Germans, the Matabele—that to open it was an achievement nothing short of heroic.
And now we may hope that the other dreams of the great dreamer are coming true. "I believe in a United States
of South Africa, but as a portion of the British Empire," said Rhodes in 1888, and again in 1888 he said: "We
must
endeavour to make those who live with us feel that there is no race distinction between us; whether Dutch or
English, we are combined in one object, and that is the union of the states of South Africa, without
abandoning the imperial tie."
The main obstacle to such a union in the past has been the refusal of one race to admit the equal claim of the
other. How nearly equal these claims are may be gathered from this little book. The Dutch conquered the
Western, the English the Eastern Province of Cape Colony. The Dutch overthrew Moselekatse and Dingaan; the
English Cetewayo and Lobengula; the Dutch cleared the trans-Orange and the Transvaal, the British settled
Rhodesia and developed Natal. The Dutch have raised cattle and ostriches, vines and grain; the English have
built roads and railways, opened harbours and mines. Each race has supplied what the other lacked, and neither
can claim to have the first title or boast of being able to walk alone. Nor can South Africans forget what
England has done for their benefit in spite of the blunders and the ignorance which have led to so much
bitterness. It is not only that Great Britain conquered the Cape and paid six millions for it; but that she
spent vast sums of treasure and many thousand lives in developing the country and conquering the native
tribes. She helped the Cape to fight the Kafirs; she settled the Basuto question and thus protected the Orange
Free State; she defeated Cetewayo and Sekukuni to the benefit of the Transvaal and Natal. With the two races
united in South Africa and the benignant power of Britain watching over them, there should surely be a great
future. The danger is that separatism and jealousy and reaction may yet triumph over the better feelings.
There are still enemies who sow tares in the night, and a rank crop is growing up in such movements as the
artificial fostering of the Dutch teal, which tends to keep the country bilingual
and therefore divided. Oh this point colonists would do well to remember the admirable advice of their great
Chief-Justice Sir Henry de Villiers, who presided at the Convention from which we all hope so much. "Surely,"
he said—in the Cape Monthly Magazine (1876)—"it would be a more genuine patriotism to improve and elevate the
mental condition of our countrymen by opening up to them those vast resources, which a study of English
literature must reveal. And if any prejudices stood in his way, the true patriot would combat them at the risk
of his own popularity in order that his countrymen might not be left behind in the race after culture and
mental improvement."
But a book which is concerned only with the romance of South Africa's history should not end in a political
dissertation, however tempting the union proposals may be as a text. It should end rather with an appeal to
South Africans to study their common history, so rich in great figures and picturesque events. Why not, for
example, celebrate the opening of the United Parliament in Cape Town, which has infinitely the best title to
be capital of South Africa, by a pageant which would illustrate the wealth of this history? We should have
Bartholomew Diaz and the terrible Vasco da Gama, Dom Stephen d'Ataide and Francesco Barreto in their morions
and coats of mail. There would be Father Monclaro with his crucifix aloft, and the first martyr, Father
Goncala, in his new surplice. We should see the sturdy Elizabethans, Shilling and Fitzherbert, walking with
Jourdain the merchant. Then van Riebeck would come along in knickerbockers and broad-brimmed hat, his lady by
his side in ruff and farthingale, and Hendrik Boom the gardener, and Eva the interpretress. There we should
see the stately figures of Simon van der Stel and his friend the Lord of Mydrecht, and Willem Adriaan his son.
Swellingrebel and all the other eighteenth century governors would follow in their footsteps, and then we
should have Lady Anne Barnard and her friends of the first conquest, the good General Janssens and Sir David
Baird, and the choleric Lord Charles Somerset, Sir Benjamin d'Urban, and Sir Harry Smith and his Spanish lady
in her black mantilla. What fine figures might be made out of the old soldiers and sailors of the Dutch East
India Company, the sailors led by van der Decken, the Flying Dutchman himself, with his white beard and his
seven pairs of breeches. We should have the pirates that defied van der Stel to lay a finger upon them, we
should see Anthon Anreith, the sculptor, and Pringle, the poet, and old Predikants in Geneva gowns might walk
with the 1820 settlers. Then there would be Chaka and Dingaan and Hintza, and the Boer heroes of the treks,
and many other figures that have flitted through these pages! It would be a brave show, winding past the old
Castle or under the spreading oaks of the Gardens, and would serve to demonstrate to South Africa what she is
apt to forget, that she has a great past as well as a great future.
|