|
|
|
A Word about Architecture
|
|
|
|
Greek Architecture
|
|
Roman Architecture
|
|
Early Christian Architecture
|
|
Byzantine Architecture
|
|
Saracenic Architecture
|
|
Romanesque Architecture
|
|
The Castle
|
|
Gothic Architecture
|
|
The Renaissance
|
|
After the Renaissance
|
|
Famous Buildings in America
|
|
Modern Architecture
|
|
Oriental Architecture
|
|
|
Introductory A Word about Architecture
The earliest records we have of man, centuries before the
building of the first temples that bordered the Nile, are
found in the remains of his ancient dwellings. The building
instinct, the desire for a home that would shelter him from
the elements and from wild beasts, marked man's development
from brute nature. In many places this first home was a cave
scooped from the earth in a hillside or was hewn out of the
rock, with a boulder serving as a doorway. In others it was
woven of reeds or formed from the boughs of trees. Man's
dawning intelligence taught him to use the material that
could be most easily adapted to the walls of his shelter.
Even to-day many races still live as primitively as their
forefathers ages ago. You see it in the skin tepee of the
Indian, in the ice-built igloo of the Arctic Circle, and in
the adobe or mud hut of the torrid regions. But, so long as
the houses were built only for protection against heat,
cold, and rain, we do not speak of their architecture. It is
when they combine a certain grace and beauty with their
usefulness that building them becomes an art. Thus
architecture came gradually into being, in the growth of the
first great nations.
Four thousand years ago, in Greece, it attained the highest
point it has reached in what we call proportion and beauty
of line; the great buildings of the Roman Empire gave it the
majesty and dignity that comes from size and mass; while in
the cathedrals of medieval Europe it found a new and more
splendid form. To-day America is, above all others, the
building nation, and the style of architecture that we are
developing will tell to the future the story of the progress
of our artistic ideals and our civilization. Just as climate
changed the form of primitive dwellings, so it influences
the architecture of highly civilized nations. As society
grew more complex people gathered together in great cities;
religion, wealth, and the ideas of the people began to
determine the character of their buildings, as well as the
location and the materials of which they were constructed.
Let us see how climate varies the type. If you have lived
in the North, you will know why a different kind of building
is more appropriate there than in the hot South, where
protection from the sun is the chief consideration. In one
place we build to keep warm, in the other to keep cool. In
the snow lands, there are steep roofs to let the snow slide
off so that the roof will not be crushed by so great a
weight. In hot countries, the houses are usually built
around a court-yard, and have a flat roof on which the
people gather in the evening.
What has building material to do with it? That is even
plainer. Where clay is abundant we shall find many houses
and public buildings of brick. When a country is young and
there are forests everywhere, lumber will be plentiful and
cheap, and the great majority of the
buildings will be constructed of wood. This applies at the
present time to our own country, where, outside of our large
cities, wooden structures are almost universal. In Europe,
on the other hand, where the forests are few and carefully
guarded, stone and concrete take its place.
What has religion to do with building? Religion inspired the
Greeks to design their beautiful temples, in order that
their place of worship might be worthy of their gods. In the
Middle Ages the same spirit of devotion impelled men to
spend years of toil erecting the great cathedrals.
And wealth? A prosperous people will have better and more
permanent buildings. They will be able to maintain great
architects who will give their whole time to designing and
building beautifully and suitably for all the practical and
artistic needs of life. The treasures of monarchs and
princes have produced countless castles and palaces in
Europe, while in America, libraries and buildings of charity
have been sown broadcast over the land, through the wealth
of private individuals.
These are only a few causes that have resulted in the
manifold developments in the art of building. It is a
process of growth that never really ceases; even the decay
and ruin of a civilization does not prevent the spread of
its architectural ideals. The creation of the type of
edifice that we call the sky-scraper in the United States
during the last few years, may be cited as an instance of
this growth, although it had for its immediate cause the
narrowness of the island on which the city of New York was
founded.
As you progress in the study of the types of buildings,
you will see that every building ought to mean something
definite, and should have an outward as well as an inward
fitness to the purpose for which it is to be used. A church
ought to be quite different from a jail, and a department
store or a factory should not look like either. The man who
builds his dwelling in a village street to-day so that it
looks like a medieval castle, or the committee that erects a
school that resembles a jail, has made a mistake for which
there is no excuse; a mistake which, with the simplest
knowledge of the main buildings of the world and their
meaning, would have been utterly impossible.
During the development of architecture, in the different
countries and through the different ages of the world,
certain distinct styles of building have grown into being.
There are not very many different styles, because each one
was hundreds of years in becoming perfected. At length, one
building in particular, or a few buildings, represented the
very best in all that long growth.
The purpose of this book is to show the reader the essential
features of the most perfect buildings, and to give a slight
idea of the life of the time which they represented. If you
can once discover the reason why Greek architecture is
called the most beautiful in the world, or understand how
and why the different styles grew and developed, you will be
able to judge the appropriateness or the faults of the
buildings that are being erected in your own town or city
to-day. With such a knowledge, the old church in your
neighborhood, the library, the city hall, or the state house
will have a new significance and a deep interest to you.
This knowledge is not
difficult to attain, for you need not go deeply into the
subject. In the past, and particularly in the Middle Ages,
it was an indispensable part of education. Boys and girls
were taught to appreciate the art and beauty in the midst of
which they lived.
At the present time we are suffering from the neglect of
these studies, a neglect that has produced the ugly,
misshapen buildings that disfigure the streets of nearly
every community in the country. We are beginning to
understand that ugly surroundings are responsible for ugly
conditions. A new spirit is sweeping over the country, a
belief in the value of beauty, whether it is in the home or
in a public building. You cannot begin too early to
understand its meaning.
The Principles of Architecture
Nearly every boy, who knows anything about the woods, or who
lives near a stream, has built, or has tried to build, a
house for himself.
Perhaps it was only a cabin of logs and brush, or if he
could get the material, a frame shack big enough to hold a
table, a stove, a bunk or two, and his canoe. Even in
constructing such a simple and elementary affair, the young
builder had to consider two things. His cabin must be the
right size for his purpose and for the place where it was to
be located. It must be strong and well built to endure the
winter winds and resist the rain and snow.
Fitness and strength are thus the two primary necessities
for any building, from a boy's shack to a great temple. Now
there are three principles on which the art
of architecture is founded. Strength, and fitness, and a
third, beauty.
Without fitness a building is useless, and is consequently
soon destroyed or made over; without strength it falls to
the ground; but if it has no beauty it is a mere collection
of brick and stones and lumber, that does not deserve to be
called architecture, though it may last for years, as a
continual reminder of the bad taste of the builder and of
the people who endured it.
When we say that architecture demands these three
principles, we must understand what is included in each in
order to be able to appreciate and judge the buildings we
are about to examine.
A principle is simply another word for a general and
universal truth, like the principle in mathematics, that the
whole is equal to the sum of all its parts. It is a cause
that governs facts; an original law, in obedience to which
facts exist. A fact may be true to-day and false to-morrow.
It may be true to-day that the Woolworth Building is the
tallest in the world. To-morrow it might be false. But a
principle is a general truth from which others are derived,
and upon which many facts may depend, and it is true always.
If we state our principles correctly, all facts will conform
to them, and if any one tells us anything, which does not
agree with a principle, we may know at once that he is
mistaken. Principles are much more useful than facts and, if
we are sure of a few principles, we can afford to forget
many facts.
Take the first principle of architecture that we mentioned,
fitness. It has to do with the practical uses of
buildings, their convenience and arrangement. A city hall,
for instance, should be large enough properly to represent
the community, and it should be dignified, because it is a
visible symbol of law and order. In this sense the fitness
of all of the great buildings of history, even of ancient
times, is most apparent. Perfection in this detail means
that the building fits into its surroundings as if Nature
herself had been the architect. The Romans went much further
than the Egyptians and Greeks, and
consciously planned their
buildings with skill and science. To-day it is almost the
chief requirement of a building, for under it come the many
modern necessities of heating, lighting, ventilation,
elevators, and drainage, as well as its adaptation to the
special purposes of the building; that is, to the purpose
for which it has been created.
In addition, fitness is concerned with location and climate.
As we have seen, in a country where there is much snow we
have a steep roof, while in the hot regions the flat roof
serves as an additional floor after sundown. Fitness may
have an even deeper and greater meaning when the architect
attempts to express in his design, his ideals, or his
religion.
Under the second great principle of architecture, strength,
come practical problems of making a building secure and
durable. We shall see how the forms of buildings often grew
out of the necessity of making them strong. The Greeks used
the perpendicular and right-angled construction, derived
from the lintel and post of their earliest dwellings. This
fixed the type of their buildings. The Romans used the round
arch as the basis
of their immense development of the art under the Empire,
and as a result their buildings look very different.
The third general principle in architecture is beauty, and
this is quite as essential as the others. The causes for the
beauty of a building lie partly in the material, its color
or its texture, or in the form of the building (which is so
important that we shall have to study it in some detail), or
in the expression of the building as produced by its
character, association, novelty, or structure. It may be a
combination of some, or all of these things, or some other
thing altogether.
The table on the following page, as given by Mr. Sidney
Fiske Kimball, will help us to remember the above
classification; and later on some of the words will be more
fully examined.
The three great divisions of a building are the walls, the
roof, and the windows or openings. Another division might be
made into six parts: first, the floor or plan; second, the
walls; third, the roof; fourth, the openings, doors,
windows, etc.; fifth, the columns and supports; and sixth,
the ornaments and decorations. It is the style, shape, and
dimensions of these different parts that determine to which
of the few great styles of architecture any building
belongs.
Most obvious to the average person are the general shape of
the mass of the building, determined by the roof and walls;
the effect produced by the openings being pointed, rounded,
or horizontal; and the presence or absence of columns; but
ornament and decoration are also very important and
essential things.
In a book like this we can say very little about
ornament, although it is so great and essential a part of a
building. Absence of moldings alone would change the entire
appearance of any great building.
Table of Essentials
| Fitness
|
Convenience for practical uses. Separation of public and private portions.
Access to all parts. Good lighting, ventilation, drainage, etc. Suitability of character.
Fitness to surroundings. |
| Strength
|
Materials. Structure: Walls, beams, arches, vaulting, roofs. |
| Beauty
|
In materials—color, texture.
In form, mass, proportion, ornament, repetition,
sequence, balance symmetry.
In expression of:
Materials and structure.
Purpose, character.
Arrangement of parts.
Environment, national and racial culture.
Personality of the artist.
Historic associations, etc. |
As we examine the pictures and study the buildings in this
book let us think of them with reference to the "Table of
Essentials." If a building in the book or one that we see in
our travels pleases and satisfies us, let us apply the
principles in trying to discover what is the cause that
produces the pleasure and satisfaction. Or
if one displeases us, let us try to discover what is wrong
about it, what there is that does not conform to the true
principles of building.
The Terms Used in Architecture
It is very important to know the meanings of terms used in
architecture.
We all know the meaning of floor, wall, roof, door, and
window. We could not describe a house without them. If we
did describe a house in these words and our reader did not
know their meanings, he would have no idea what we were
talking about. Yet people constantly read works and
guide-books, who do not know the precise meaning of such
common and necessary terms as capital, clerestory, crypt,
order, nave, pediment, spandrel, transept, tympanum, and so
forth. These and several more must be understood. It is not
enough to look them up that you may understand some given
description, they should be learned by heart. It is a
thousand times worth while to do so. They are the keys that
unlock many doors.
(An alphabetically arranged glossary of architectural terms,
and also of the Proper Names mentioned, will be found at the
end of the volume.)
The Story of Architecture
The history of architecture tells the story of the
development of the art of building. Nations have risen from
the darkness of the past, and have attained great power and
culture, only to sink into obscurity again,
leaving, as the only evidence of their greatness, the ruins
of forgotten temples and of cities that once swarmed with
life. So the study of buildings is, in its broadest sense, a
preparation for the study of history and of civilization
itself.
Before beginning to examine the "type buildings" that we
have selected for special study, let us take a bird's-eye
view of the whole field, remembering that the styles of
architecture form a continuous development from first to
last. The spirit of each age of the world has determined the
changes made from the style of the preceding age, and a
knowledge of the buildings that represent the main types
will be of everyday service to any one who reads books and
newspapers and talks with intelligent people.
Those ancient peoples, the Assyrians, the Chinese, the
Japanese, and the inhabitants of India, represent the
earliest of architectures, but they had little influence
upon the great historical buildings we are to study, and we
may regard them more as curiosities than as objects of
study.
Following these nations came the Egyptians, the Greeks, and
the Romans, in the order named. The architectures of these
peoples we still imitate to-day and we need to know as much
as possible about the buildings they erected.
The Byzantine, Romanesque, and Saracenic architectures next
came into being and were developed, while, from the
thirteenth to the fifteenth centuries, the Gothic style led,
developing widely and in slightly different ways in all the
leading countries of Europe.
Then came the great intellectual awakening of the fifteenth
century called the Renaissance, which produced the great
painters, the great sculptors, and the great builders of the
next three hundred years. From that day to this there has
been little new, but revivals and combinations of old styles
prevailed until the arrival of the skyscraper and the Modernist.
The different styles are most easily fixed in the mind by
means of pictures of the best buildings of these types. It
will give a foretaste of what these succeeding styles are
like if we think of the subject under the following
elementary classification.
I
Architecture of the Beam or Lintel. In this type all windows
or openings are spanned by a straight beam. Such was the
work of the Egyptians, the Persians, and the Greeks. An
example of lintel construction is given in the image of Doric Architecture.
II
Architecture of the Round Arch. This class includes all
buildings in which such openings are spanned by a
semicircular arch. The Assyrians and the Etruscans employed
it. The Romans employed it later, and used it with the beam.
The styles using this structure are the Romanesque, the
Norman, and the Byzantine. A simple example of arch
construction is the illustration on page 52.
III
Architecture of the Pointed Arch. Buildings in which the
pointed arch is used include the Mohammedan in the East and
the Gothic in the West. Simple examples of pointed arches
will be found on pages 133 and 141.
IV
Renaissance. The combination of lintel construction with
Greco-Roman ornamentation. This style began with the
fifteenth century and spread rapidly. Michaelangelo was one
of its greatest exponents. Look at the pictures on pages 163
and 176 for details of this combination style.
Chronological Table
The following table will be helpful for easy reference, as
well as for preliminary study, and will enable us to see the
relation of any style of building to other buildings in time
and place.
kind and place
|
type buildings
|
men of prominence
|
characteristic features
|
| Egyptian |
Pyramids Temple Edfou (late) Luxor, Karnak |
Rulers and architects |
Solidity, slanting lines, columns. |
| Greek |
Parthenon Erechtheum |
Phidias Pericles |
Three orders of columns, sculputral decoration,simplicity and perfect proportions. |
| Roman |
Colosseum Pantheon Arches Palaces Temples |
Iktinus (Architect of the Parthenon) Emperors Nero Flavius Hadrian Vespasian Diocletian |
Rounded arch; vaulting dome Practical usefulness. Engineering works; theaters, etc. Paneling and decoration. |
| Early Christian |
S. Apollinaire, Ravenna St. Paul's without the walls, Rome (rebuilt 1821) Basilicas |
Constantine |
Broad nave, rows of columns and side-aisles and clerestory; wood roof, atrium in front, plain exterior, rich interior |
Mohammedan Saracenic Sassanian Arabic Moresque, etc. |
Mosque of Cordova Aleazar Alhambra Taj Mahal Agra |
Mohammed |
Beautiful domes, colored tiles and decoration, arabesques; geometrical, slender interlaced pattern, minarets, horse-shoe arch. |
Romanesque Eleventh and twelfth centuries |
Pisa San Mineato, Florence Durham, England |
Monks and rulers |
Chiefly church architecture, rounded arch, vaulted stone ceiling. |
| Gothic, France |
Saint Chapelle, Paris, 1242 Notre Dame, Paris, 1163 Cathedrals Rouen Reims Chartre palais de Justice (Rouen late) Hôtel de Cluny (late) |
Maurice de Sully De Lusarches (Amiens) De Corby |
Flying buttress, pointed arch, ribbed vaulting, tracery and glass. |
| Gothic Great Britain |
Lincoln, 1185 Westminster Abbey, 1245 |
Wm. of Sens Wm. of Wykeham |
Early 1180-1280, Simplicity and purity. Decorated 1280-1380 Rich decoration, lightness of construction. Perpendicular, fan vaulting, vertical tracery. |
Gothic Germany and Belgium and Spain. |
Cologne Cathedral, 1243 Strasburg, 1240 Antwerp, 1352 Town Halls (Brussels, Bruges) and guilds (Louvain) Seville in Spain |
|
Variations, circular churches, use of brick. |
| Gothic Italy |
Siena Orvieto Cathedral Florence Loggia di Lanzi, Florence Doges' Palace, Venice Certosa of Pavia Milan Cathedral |
Pisano |
Less real Gothic structure than in other countries; |
| Renaissance Italy Early 1420-1480 |
Dome of Florence Cathedral Riccardi Palace, Florence Pitti Palace |
Brunnelleschi, 1377-1446 Michelozzo for Cosimo de Medici |
More form than construction; chiefly of palaces; modified Roman columns; revival of classic forms orignially and freely applied. |
| High 1490-1550 |
Vatican St. Peter's Farnese Palace, Rome Villa Medici |
Bramante Michelangelo Sansovino (Venice) San Gallo Raphael |
Formal classic refinement and dignity; domes. |
Decline Baroque 1550-1600
Rococo 1600-1700 |
Santa Maria della Salute, Venice Library,
Fountain of Trevi, Rome |
Bernini
Maderna |
Engaged columns. Colossal orders. Poverty of invention, sham decoration, huge scrolls, florid stucco, and lack of propriety. |
Renaissance France Early Advanced Louis XIV or Classic Period, 1645-1715 |
Fontainebleau Château de Blois Luxemburg Louvre Versailles Invalides |
Francis I 1520-1547
Pierre Lescot De Lorme |
Gradual introduction of classic.
Louis XIV. The great period. |
| Decline or Rococo (Louis XV) 1715-74 |
St. Sulpice Palaces |
Louis XV |
Uninteresting exteriors. Extravagantly decorated interiors. |
| Renaissance Gt. Britain |
Whitehall St. Paul's, London |
Inigo Jones, 1572-1652 Sir Christopher Wren, 1632-1723 |
Slow release from Gothic; a picturesque mixture of Gothic and Renaissance. |
| Renaissance Germany |
Town Halls Zwinger Palace, Dresden Heidelberg Castle |
K. Vischer |
An early, late, and a declining period, as in France. |
Renaissance Spain Early 1500-1556 Classic, to 1650 |
Cathedral, Granada University, Salamanca Escurial Monastery |
Juan Battista |
An early and classic, followed by an extravagant decline. |
| Decline |
Palace Charles V. Granada |
|
|
|